“WTO Gambling Decision Has Everyone Guessing: Who Won?”
Having their cake and eating it
too is the way some might describe the recent WTO ruling,
in which neither Antigua nor the U.S. is a clear-cut winner.
Agreeing both that the U.S. has the right to maintain “public order” by
banning online gambling and that American policies are violating
free trade practices, the WTO has left people even more confused
than they were before.
Does the U.S. ban on Internet gambling violate free trade
agreements? Is this ban discriminatory against foreign operators?
Antigua and Barbuda, two small island nations, believe it
is, and they put their money where their mouth was, by appealing
to the WTO for a ruling on the U.S. ban.
The results, however, are far from
conclusive. On the one hand, the WTO seemed to confirm
that the U.S. does in fact hold a double standard by allowing
horse race betting and other land-based gambling to take
place in certain states while prohibiting foreign online
casino operators from access to U.S. gamblers. On the other
hand, the WTO also stands behind the U.S. claim that by
banning online gambling it means to protect “public morals.” So,
many are asking, who was the victor in this case: the U.S.
or the two tiny island states of Antigua and Barbuda?
For all practical purposes, it
doesn’t seem to matter.
The U.S. will continue to ban online gambling, and Americans
will continue to engage in it. As it is, American players
account for about half the $10 billion of revenues generated.
Most people in the industry are predicting that eventually
the U.S. will come around to adopting the online gambling
policies that have already been adopted by countries such
as Australia and England. After all, many U.S. states already
allow land-based gambling, and if the U.S. finally allowed
American firms to compete against foreign online gambling
firms, it would be doing itself a favor. If online gambling
were taking place on the up-and-up, the U.S. would be able
to regulate the industry and tax the revenues, turning a
formerly shady business into a lucrative and perhaps even
reputable one.
Back to Online Gambling News April 2005 Edition
|